Use o3 (openai/o3).
This is one of the cases where paying for more reasoning is justified.
~8.6× more per run.
Which AI model should you use to design an event driven architecture?
Why ->
The task description signals deeper reasoning, trade-off analysis, or risk-heavy judgement. A larger tier earns its cost here because it handles longer reasoning chains and ambiguity more reliably.
Cost breakdown
| Model | Provider | Tier | Input cost | Output cost | Est. / 1k calls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| o3 openai/o3 | Openai | Deep | $0.002000 | $0.008000 | $10.80 |
| GPT-5 Mini openai/gpt-5-mini | Openai | Moderate | $0.000250 | $0.002000 | $1.25 |
Matched signals
- architecture
- event driven
- design
- architect
This recommendation is based on the task description alone. If you are attaching a large codebase, mention it in the input above.
Model pricing: OpenRouter model catalog, retrieved April 17, 2026. Classification: rightmodel ruleset v2.
Related tasks
Design a Microservices API Boundary
DeepPlan service boundaries, API contracts, and failure handling across several cooperating services.
Use o3.
Design an Application Caching Strategy
DeepPlan cache layers, invalidation, freshness rules, and operational trade offs for an app surface.
Use o3.
Diagnose a Distributed Tracing Gap
DeepReason across services to find where tracing context is dropped or no longer correlated.
Use o3.